Near-IR empirical calibrations of the RGB morphological & evolutionary features vs metallicity
- RGB colors, magnitudes and slope vs Metallicity: from Valenti, Ferraro & Origlia (2004,MNRAS,351,1204)
- RGB bump & Tip vs Metallicity: from Valenti, Ferraro & Origlia (2004,MNRAS,354,814) and Valenti, Ferraro & Origlia (2006, astro-ph/0612280)
- The Global Metallicity [M/H] - The Bulge-like and Disk-like chemical enrichment scenarios: from Ferraro, Valenti & Origlia (2006,ApJ,649,243)
RGB colors at fixed magnitude levels vs [Fe/H]
(J-K)0MK=-5.5 = 0.22 [Fe/H] + 1.14 or [Fe/H] = 4.15 (J-K)0MK=-5.5 - 4.81
(J-K)0MK=-5 = 0.20 [Fe/H] + 1.06 or [Fe/H] = 4.58 (J-K)0MK=-5 - 4.96
(J-K)0MK=-4 = 0.16 [Fe/H] + 0.93 or [Fe/H] = 5.63 (J-K)0MK=-4 - 5.35
(J-K)0MK=-3 = 0.13 [Fe/H] + 0.83 or [Fe/H] = 7.06 (J-K)0MK=-3 - 5.90
(J-H)0MH=-5.5 = 0.20 [Fe/H] + 0.97 or [Fe/H] = 5.14 (J-H)0MH=-5.5 - 4.88
(J-H)0MH=-5 = 0.19 [Fe/H] + 0.92 or [Fe/H] = 5.50 (J-H)0MH=-5 - 4.96
(J-H)0MH=-4 = 0.16 [Fe/H] + 0.82 or [Fe/H] = 6.29 (J-H)0MH=-4 - 5.10
(J-H)0MH=-3 = 0.14 [Fe/H] + 0.74 or [Fe/H] = 7.26 (J-H)0MH=-3 - 5.31
RGB Magnitudes at constant color vs [Fe/H]
MK(J-K)0=0.7 = 2.09 [Fe/H] - 1.16 or [Fe/H] = 0.43 MK(J-K)0=0.7 + 0.39
MH(J-H)0=0.7 = 2.90 [Fe/H] - 1.87 or [Fe/H] = 0.34 MH(J-H)0=0.7 + 0.61
RGB slope vs [Fe/H]
[Fe/H] = - 22.21 JKslope- 2.80
[Fe/H] = - 25.26 JHslope- 2.55
RGB Bump vs [Fe/H]
MJBump = 0.39 + 1.63 [Fe/H] + 0.28 [Fe/H]2
MHBump = - 0.12 + 1.68 [Fe/H] + 0.34 [Fe/H]2
MKBump = - 0.25 + 1.57 [Fe/H] + 0.27 [Fe/H]2
MBolBump = 1.93 + 1.73 [Fe/H] + 0.29 [Fe/H]2
RGB Tip vs [Fe/H]
MJTip = - 5.67 - 0.31 [Fe/H]
MHTip = - 6.71 - 0.47 [Fe/H]
MKTip = - 6.98 - 0.58 [Fe/H]
MBolTip = - 3.87 - 0.18 [Fe/H]
THE GLOBAL METALLICITY [M/H]
As extensively discussed in Ferraro
et al.(1999, 2000) a correct parameterization of the RGB
characteristics as a function of the metal content of the stellar
population does require the knowledge of the so-called "global"
metallicity, which takes into account the iron as well as the
alpha-element abundances. Indeed, the location of the RGB strongly
depends on the low ionization potential [Fe+Mg+Si/H] abundance mixture
(Straniero & Chieffi 1991; Salaris & Cassisi 1996) rather than
[Fe/H] abundance alone. In fact, the low ionization potential elements
are the main contributors to free electrons, which generate the H- ion, the major component responsible for the continuum opacity in the RGB temperature range (3000-6000 K; Renzini 1977).
In halo/disk field stars, the average [alpha/Fe] abundance ratio shows
a general enhancement of 0.3 - 0.5 dex with respect to the solar value
up to [Fe/]~ -1 (see e.g. Boesgaard et al.1999; Gratton et al.2000;
Carretta et al.2000; and references therein) and a linear decreasing trend toward solar [alpha/Fe] with further encreasing metallicity.
An [alpha/Fe] enhanchement is also found in the metal-poor halo GCs
(see e.g. Gratton et al.2004; Sneden et al.2004; and references
therein). The actual position of the knee (i.e. the metallicity at
which [alpha/Fe] begins to decrease) depends on the Type Ia SN
timescales, and it is also a function of the star formation rate, while
the amount of the alpha-enhancement depends on the initial mass
function of the progenitors of the Type II SNe (see McWilliam 1997).
High resolution optical (McWiliam & Rich 1994; Rich & McWilliam
2000; Carretta et al.2001; Zoccali et al. 2004; Lecureur et al.2006;
Fulbright et al.2004,2006) and IR (Origlia et al.2002,2004,2005a,b;
Melendez et al.2003; Rich & Origlia 2005) spectroscopic studies of
both cluster and field stars in the Galactic bulge point toward an
alpha-enhancement by a factor of 2 - 3 up to solar metallicity.
To take into account the above picture, independent sets of global
metallicities and IR photometric relations have been computed according
to two different scenarios of chemical enrichment (see Fig. 1).
In both scenarios, the contribution of the alpha-elements
enhancement has been taken into account by simply rescaling standard
models to the global metallicity [M/H] according to the following
relation (Salaris et al. 1993):
[M/H] = [Fe/H] + log (0.638 fa + 0.362)
where fa is the enhanced factor of the alpha-elements.
Equation Set in the Disk-like Enrichment scenario
Accordingly to Ferraro et al.(1999,AJ,118,1738), in the Disk-like scenario the alpha-elements enhancement factor fa is as follows:
fa = 100.28 for [Fe/H] < -1
fa = 10-0.28[Fe/H] for [Fe/H] >= -1
RGB colors at fixed magnitude levels vs [M/H]
(J-K)0MK=-5.5 = 0.23 [M/H] + 1.11 or [M/H] = 3.84 (J-K)0MK=-5.5 - 4.37
(J-K)0MK=-5 = 0.21 [M/H] + 1.04 or [M/H] = 4.24 (J-K)0MK=-5 - 4.51
(J-K)0MK=-4 = 0.17 [M/H] + 0.92 or [M/H] = 5.20 (J-K)0MK=-4 - 4.87
(J-K)0MK=-3 = 0.14 [M/H] + 0.81 or [M/H] = 6.48 (J-K)0MK=-3 - 5.36
(J-H)0MH=-5.5 = 0.21 [M/H] + 0.94 or [M/H] = 4.82 (J-H)0MH=-5.5 - 4.48
(J-H)0MH=-5 = 0.20 [M/H] + 0.90 or [M/H] = 5.16 (J-H)0MH=-5 - 4.55
(J-H)0MH=-4 = 0.17 [M/H] + 0.80 or [M/H] = 5.88 (J-H)0MH=-4 - 4.67
(J-H)0MH=-3 = 0.15 [M/H] + 0.72 or [M/H] = 6.78 (J-H)0MH=-3 - 4.86
RGB Magnitudes at constant color vs [M/H]
MK(J-K)0=0.7 = 2.22 [M/H] - 1.38 or [M/H] = 0.41 MK(J-K)0=0.7 + 0.48
MH(J-H)0=0.7 = 3.05 [M/H] - 2.23 or [M/H] = 0.32 MH(J-H)0=0.7 + 0.70
RGB slope vs [M/H]
[M/H] = - 20.83 JKslope- 2.53
[M/H] = - 23.77 JHslope- 2.29
RGB Bump vs [M/H]
MJBump = 0.57 + 2.31 [M/H] + 0.56 [M/H]2
MHBump = - 0.38 + 1.53 [M/H] + 0.38 [M/H]2
MKBump = - 0.17 + 2.07 [M/H] + 0.49 [M/H]2
MBolBump = 2.03 + 2.30 [M/H] + 0.54 [M/H]2
RGB Tip vs [M/H]
MJTip = - 5.64 - 0.32 [M/H]
MHTip = - 6.66 - 0.49 [M/H]
MKTip = - 6.92 - 0.62 [M/H]
MBolTip = - 3.85 - 0.19 [M/H]
Equation Set in the Bulge-like Enrichment scenario
Accordingly to Carney's (1996) suggestions and the recent results on Bulge field and cluster populations, in the Bulge-like scenario the alpha-elements enhancement factor fa is as follows:
fa = 100.30 for - 2 < [Fe/H] < 0
RGB colors at fixed magnitude levels vs [M/H]
(J-K)0MK=-5.5 = 0.22 [M/H] + 1.09 or [M/H] = 4.13 (J-K)0MK=-5.5 - 5.59
(J-K)0MK=-5 = 0.20 [M/H] + 1.02 or [M/H] = 4.55 (J-K)0MK=-5 - 4.74
(J-K)0MK=-4 = 0.16 [M/H] + 0.90 or [M/H] = 5.58 (J-K)0MK=-4 - 5.12
(J-K)0MK=-3 = 0.13 [M/H] + 0.79 or [M/H] = 6.94 (J-K)0MK=-3 - 5.64
(J-H)0MH=-5.5 = 0.18 [M/H] + 0.90 or [M/H] = 5.13 (J-H)0MH=-5.5 - 4.68
(J-H)0MH=-5 = 0.17 [M/H] + 0.85 or [M/H] = 5.50 (J-H)0MH=-5 - 4.75
(J-H)0MH=-4 = 0.15 [M/H] + 0.77 or [M/H] = 6.28 (J-H)0MH=-4 - 4.89
(J-H)0MH=-3 = 0.13 [M/H] + 0.69 or [M/H] = 7.25 (J-H)0MH=-3 - 5.10
RGB Magnitudes at constant color vs [M/H]
MK(J-K)0=0.7 = 2.08 [M/H] - 1.58 or [M/H] = 0.43 MK(J-K)0=0.7 + 0.57
MH(J-H)0=0.7 = 2.90 [M/H] - 2.46 or [M/H] = 0.34 MH(J-H)0=0.7 + 0.81
RGB slope vs [M/H]
[M/H] = - 22.50 JKslope- 2.63
[M/H] = - 25.14 JHslope- 2.34
RGB Tip vs [M/H]
MJTip = - 5.63 - 0.31 [M/H]
MHTip = - 6.60 - 0.46 [M/H]
MKTip = - 6.84 - 0.56 [M/H]