Back to article listing

Shortcut to the SSP models




Massarotti, M., Iovino, A., Buzzoni, A.:
"A critical appraisal of the SED fitting method to estimate photometric redshifts",
2001, Astron. Astrophys., 368, 74.

Summary:
We analyze the stability of the photometric redshift estimate with the SED fitting method with respect to the choice of the galaxy template. An application to the Hubble Deep Field North is discussed.



Pick up the paper at Astro-ph/0101445 Local link to the gzipped Postscript version (1.0Mb)
    
HTML version at the A&Ap site  (*) PDF file at the A&Ap site  (*)
    
 (*) requires password
   Browse the jpeg tables and figures (click on the thumbnails)
Table 1 - Galaxy templates from the reference synthesis codes and from Coleman et al. (1980)
Figure 1 - Restframe portion of galaxy SED explored by the WFPC2 photometric system at z = 0 and z = 2. As an illustrative example a template model for local elliptical galaxies is shown.
Figure 2 - Panel a: the adopted dust attenuation law after Calzetti (1999). Panel b: the IGM attenuation in a magnitude scale at redshift 2.5, 3.5 and 4.5, as labelled, according to Madau (1995).
Figure 3 - The effect of internal reddening and IGM on the Sb reference template from Buzzoni (2000). Dust attenuation for E(B−V) up to 0.3 mag, as labelled, is shown in the upper panel, while the expected break induced by the Ly-α forest at z = 1.5 and z = 3 is shown in the lower panel. For reference, the HST photometric system and the Johnson JHK bands are displayed at the bottom.
Figure 4 - Comparison of the statistical uncertainty in the redshift estimate due to photometric errors for the BC, BUZ and FRV reference libraries, as well as for the CWWE empirical templates. Residuals are from a bootstrap simulation of the FSLY galaxy catalog (1041 objects for each of ten simulated catalog samples).
Figure 5 - Comparison of HDFN expected redshift distribution, for different reference libraries. The solid line is for Δ z = 0.0, while long-dashed strip is for Δ z = ± 0.5. The vertical strip (solid lines) in panel (d) encloses the catastrophic outliers coming from the misinterpretation of the Balmer/Lyman break (see text for further details).
Figure 6 - SED fitting of the FSLY galaxy subsample beyond z > 2. The data distribution by matching the FRV template set is compared with a "minimal" reference library consisting of two Kurucz' (1992) model atmospheres for stars of spectral type B0 and B2. The relative σ(z) results 0.18 with no apparent drift in the data distribution. The solid line is for Δ z = 0.0, while long-dashed strip is for Δ z = ± 0.5. See text for a full discussion.
Figure 7 - The expected age-redshift relation from the BC, BUZ and FRV best templates by imposing no cosmological constraint. HDFN galaxies have been grouped in order to guarantee at least 100 objects per redshift bin. Solid, grid, and diagonal-shaded histograms are the 50%, 75%, and 90% envelopes of galaxy age distribution. In each plot, solid and dotted lines are the theoretical age-z relation for H_o = 50 and q_o = 0.0 and 0.5, respectively.
Figure 8 - The U_300−B_450 apparent color as a function of redshift for the CWW Im empirical template (solid line) and Leitherer et al. (1999) 50 Myr starburst model (dashed line). In absence of any starburst template, a fraction of star-forming galaxies at z ~ 2 (with U_300−B_450 ~ 0.8) might be interpreted as local (z ≤ 0.2) irregulars.
Figure 9 - Restframe composite SED from the HST data for the 341 HDFN galaxies with fiducial z > 1.5 compared with the CWWE reference templates. From top to bottom solid lines display the starburst template with t = 500 Myr and E(B−V) = 0.0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, the t = 50 Myr starburst model with E(B−V) = 0.0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, the Scd and the Im CWW spectra.
Figure 10 - The selective influence of galaxy internal reddening on the SED fitting performance. The HDFN redshift distribution from the BC template set is displayed with and without taking into account for ISM absorption. This is done by leaving E(B−V) = 0 or as a free fitting parameter in the range 0.0 ≤ E(B−V) ≤ 0.3. Long-dashed lines in the plot represent Δ z = ± 0.5.
Figure 11 - Comparison of the HDFN redshift distribution obtained from the BUZ reference library with and without taking into account the IGM absorption. Long-dashed lines in the plot represent Δ z = ± 0.5. The solid line shows the expected upper limit in the redshift drift due to the the misinterpretation of the intrinsic Lyman break with the Ly-α forest effect.



Back to article listing

Shortcut to the SSP models



 
AB/Jun 2019